Why did he punish anyone? in the Point of Christianity as A "Religion" towards Humanity.

An omniscient God would know what his creation would do in a given scenario. That is like me leaving my nephews and nieces alone in a room full of candy and telling him not to eat it and then killing him when he does. Since I knew he would eat it, I must bear at least some (most) of the blame for what happened. So, if I as an imperfect person can be held responsible for having foreknowledge and failing to act appropriately how can a perfect being not be?


On a lighter note, God held Adam responsible for the fall, not Eve. If Adam had not eaten the fruit and only Eve, God would not have reacted as He did. When Adam ate it changed everything. Adam was put in charge over Eve, and God held him responsible for this disobedience. Now all he had to say to her was NO, but he did not. Then he tried to blame it all on "this woman that you gave me". Nothing has changed in 6000 years.


According to the Biblical view of all of this, God is simply not all-forgiving. He is most certainly a God of justice and so He will not reward those who hate Him nor give them something they do not wish to have. Man has rejected God by his own free choice, not just once but repeatedly, despite the evidence in Creation, more wonders of which are being discovered almost daily, as well as the revelation through Jesus Christ in our context of "Religion". So humanity is receiving the fruit of its own choices, just as it is blessed when it, or individuals in it, turn back to God. So also, even though Eve certainly ate first, Adam is actually given more blame because Eve was deceived but Adam made a willful and knowing choice to join in her sin. All this took place only about 6000 or so years ago, and even though mankind has inherited the propensity to follow the first humans we all also make many choices which indicate that if we had been in their position we would have done likewise. 


To curb this heavily diagnosed race, Man kind should posses the following traits such as Compassion , Enlightenment, Virtuoso, Wisdom, And Love. It is the key of promoting harmony in this world with all differences in faith,race,colors,tongues,and lands. 


Below are the Only Reasons WHY HUMANITY NEEDS TO BE HUMAN FOR HUMANITY DESPITES THE DIFFERENCES IN BELIEVES,FAITH,CULTURE,TRADITIONS,& PEOPLE'S WAY OF LIFE FOR "US AS HUMANITY"

1. "Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) is a nucleic acid that contains the genetic instructions used in the development and functioning of all known livingorganisms and some viruses. The main role of DNA molecules is the long-term storage of information. DNA is often compared to a set of blueprints or a recipe, or a code, since it contains the instructions needed to construct other components of cells, such as proteins and RNA molecules. The DNA segments that carry this genetic information are called genes, but other DNA sequences have structural purposes, or are involved in regulating the use of this genetic information. EVERY HUMAN SHARES THIS SAME TRADES IN FACT EVERY LIVING THING THAT BREATH LIEF HAS A GENETIC DISTINCT STRUCTURES" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DNA\
2. Bringing a child into the world should not be about our narcissism, vanity, or an attempt at indirect immortality, because we are all unfairly biased for ourselves and our genes.
3. History Of Man.
4. "I think we should focus on what is right also! If we focus on what is wrong, let it be to warn ourselves and others. Too much negative brings a drain on our spirits. " http://people.tribe.net/gg?_click_path=Application[tribe].Person[da63c1dd-a515-4963-8e46-c38edf4031d0]
5. "As long as there are people helping people, caring for other people, there is right in humanity today." http://people.tribe.net/gg?_click_path=Application[tribe].Person[da63c1dd-a515-4963-8e46-c38edf4031d0]
6.  "The rain still comes." http://people.tribe.net/gg?_click_path=Application[tribe].Person[da63c1dd-a515-4963-8e46-c38edf4031d0]
7.  "The sun still shines. " http://people.tribe.net/gg?_click_path=Application[tribe].Person[da63c1dd-a515-4963-8e46-c38edf4031d0]
8.  "You have your body. There is health there. Build on it." http://people.tribe.net/gg?_click_path=Application[tribe].Person[da63c1dd-a515-4963-8e46-c38edf4031d0]
9. "You have your soul, your focus of life. Unite it with the power of the creator. Build it up." http://people.tribe.net/gg?_click_path=Application[tribe].Person[da63c1dd-a515-4963-8e46-c38edf4031d0]
10. "You have friends and family. Honor them even if they are now only a memory. " http://people.tribe.net/gg?_click_path=Application[tribe].Person[da63c1dd-a515-4963-8e46-c38edf4031d0]
11. "Everyday if we all did all we could to make this world a better place, it would slowly be a better place." http://people.tribe.net/gg?_click_path=Application[tribe].Person[da63c1dd-a515-4963-8e46-c38edf4031d0]
12. "Remember that happiness comes from within and spreads outward not the other way around. Any happiness from without is only fleeting, temporary. " http://people.tribe.net/gg?_click_path=Application[tribe].Person[da63c1dd-a515-4963-8e46-c38edf4031d0]
13.  "Be positive. Be someone you would want to be around. Then other people will want to be around you." http://people.tribe.net/gg?_click_path=Application[tribe].Person[da63c1dd-a515-4963-8e46-c38edf4031d0]
14. "All our reverses can turn to positives if we grow with them. The wind blows against the trees. They grow with it. We can also. " http://people.tribe.net/gg?_click_path=Application[tribe].Person[da63c1dd-a515-4963-8e46-c38edf4031d0]

"It is very difficult to preserve a legitimate pride in self if one is filled with indignant revulsion at their culture/Nation, gender, and even their species. I do not allow myself to go to the dark side and act on these thoughts of desperate rage and agonizing empathy but to ignore their existence and pretend they are illegitimate is also harmful.
To do nothing is harmful but to do nothing about them is worse. " Lazarus , http://people.tribe.net/lazarus_long

Arranged & Expressed By,

The Author

FreedomExpressions©

Human Playing God.

To be Expressed soon. Literature in Progress

FreedomExpressions©

In Palestine, a War on Children by John Pilger

June 15, 2006

In Palestine, a War on Children

by John Pilger

Arthur Miller wrote, "Few of us can easily surrender our belief that society must somehow make sense. The thought that the state has lost its mind and is punishing so many innocent people is intolerable. And so the evidence has to be internally denied." Miller's truth was a glimpsed reality on television on June 9 when Israeli warships fired on families picnicking on a Gaza beach, killing seven people, including three children and three generations. What that represents is a final solution, agreed by the United States and Israel, to the problem of the Palestinians. While the Israelis fire missiles at Palestinian picnickers and homes in Gaza and the West Bank, the two governments are to starve them. The victims will be mostly children. This was approved on May 23 by the U.S. House of Representatives, which voted 361-37 to cut off aid to non-government organizations that run a lifeline to occupied Palestine. Israel is withholding Palestinian revenues and tax receipts amounting to $60 million a month. Such collective punishment, identified as a crime against humanity in the Geneva Conventions, evokes the Nazis' strangulation of the Warsaw ghetto and the American economic siege of Iraq in the 1990s. If the perpetrators have lost their minds, as Miller suggested, they appear to understand their barbarism and display their cynicism. "The idea is to put the Palestinians on a diet," joked Dov Weisglass, an adviser to the Israeli prime minister, Ehud Olmert. This is the price Palestinians must pay for their democratic elections in January. The majority voted for the "wrong" party, Hamas, which the U.S. and Israel, with their inimitable penchant for pot-calling-the-kettle-black, describe as terrorist. However, terrorism is not the reason for starving the Palestinians, whose prime minister, Ismail Haniyeh, had reaffirmed Hamas's commitment to recognize the Jewish state, proposing only that Israel obey international law and respect the borders of 1967. Israel has refused because, with its apartheid wall under construction, its intention is clear: to take over more and more of Palestine, encircling whole villages and eventually Jerusalem. The reason Israel fears Hamas is that Hamas is unlikely to be a trusted collaborator in subjugating its own people on Israel's behalf. Indeed, the vote for Hamas was actually a vote for peace. Palestinians were fed up with the failures and corruption of the Arafat era. According to the former U.S. president Jimmy Carter, whose Carter Center verified the Hamas electoral victory, "public opinion polls show that 80 percent of Palestinians want a peace agreement with Israel." How ironic this is, considering that the rise of Hamas was due in no small part to the secret support it received from Israel, which, with the U.S. and Britain, wanted Islamists to undermine secular Arabism and its "moderate" dreams of freedom. Hamas refused to play this Machiavellian game and in the face of Israeli assaults maintained a cease-fire for 18 months. The objective of the Israeli attack on the beach at Gaza was clearly to sabotage the cease-fire. This is a time-honored tactic. Now, state terror in the form of a medieval siege is to be applied to the most vulnerable. For the Palestinians, a war against their children is hardly new. A 2004 field study published in the British Medical Journal reported that, in the previous four years, "Two-thirds of the 621 children … killed [by the Israelis] at checkpoints … on the way to school, in their homes, died from small arms fire, directed in over half the cases to the head, neck, and chest – the sniper's wound." A quarter of Palestinian infants under the age of five are acutely or chronically malnourished. The Israeli wall "will isolate 97 primary health clinics and 11 hospitals from the populations they serve." The study described "a man in a now fenced-in village near Qalqilya [who] approached the gate with his seriously ill daughter in his arms and begged the soldiers on duty to let him pass so that he could take her to hospital. The soldiers refused." Gaza, now sealed like an open prison and terrorized by the sonic boom of Israeli fighter aircraft, has a population of which almost half is under 15. Dr. Khalid Dahlan, a psychiatrist who heads a children's community health project, told me, "The statistic I personally find unbearable is that 99.4 percent of the children we studied suffer trauma … 99.2 percent had their homes bombarded; 97.5 percent were exposed to tear gas; 96.6 percent witnessed shooting; a third saw family members or neighbors injured or killed." These children suffer unrelenting nightmares and "night terrors" and the dichotomy of having to cope with these conditions. On the one hand, they dream about becoming doctors and nurses "so they can help others"; on the other, this is then overtaken by an apocalyptic vision of themselves as the next generation of suicide bombers. They experience this invariably after attacks by the Israelis. For some boys, their heroes are no longer football players, but a confusion of Palestinian "martyrs" and even the enemy, "because Israeli soldiers are the strongest and have Apache gunships." That these children are now to be punished further may be beyond human comprehension, but there is a logic. Over the years, the Palestinians have avoided falling into the abyss of an all-out civil war, knowing this is what the Israelis want. Destroying their elected government while attempting to build a parallel administration around the collusive Palestinian president, Mahmoud Abbas, may well produce, as the Oxford academic Karma Nabulsi wrote, "a Hobbesian vision of an anarchic society … ruled by disparate militias, gangs, religious ideologues and broken into ethnic and religious tribalism, and co-opted collaborationists. Look to the Iraq of today: that is what [Ariel Sharon] had in store for us." The struggle in Palestine is an American war, waged from America's most heavily armed foreign military base, Israel. In the West, we are conditioned not to think of the Israeli-Palestinian "conflict" in those terms, just as we are conditioned to think of the Israelis as victims, not illegal and brutal occupiers. This is not to underestimate the ruthless initiatives of the Israeli state, but without F-16s and Apaches and billions of American taxpayers' dollars, Israel would have made peace with the Palestinians long ago. Since the Second World War, the U.S. has given Israel some $140 billion, much of it as armaments. According to the Congressional Research Service, the same "aid" budget was to include $28 million "to help [Palestinian] children deal with the current conflict situation" and to provide "basic first aid." That has now been vetoed. Karma Nabulsi's comparison with Iraq is apposite, for the same "policy" applies there. The capture of Abu Musab al-Zarqawi was a wonderful media event: what the philosopher Hannah Arendt called "action as propaganda," and having little bearing on reality. The Americans and those who act as their bullhorn have their demon – even a video game of his house being blown up. The truth is that Zarqawi was largely their creation. His apparent killing serves an important propaganda purpose, distracting us in the west from the American goal of converting Iraq, like Palestine, into a powerless society of ethnic and religious tribalism. Death squads, formed and trained by veterans of the CIA's "counterinsurgency" in central America, are critical to this. The Special Police Commandos, a CIA creation led by former senior intelligence officers in Saddam Hussein's Ba'ath Party, are perhaps the most brutal. The Zarqawi killing and the myths about his importance also deflect from routine massacres by U.S. soldiers, such as the one at Haditha. Even the puppet Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki complains that murderous behavior of U.S. troops is "a daily occurrence." As I learned in Vietnam, a form of serial killing, then known officially as "body count," is the way the Americans fight their colonial wars. This is known as "pacification." The asymmetry of a pacified Iraq and a pacified Palestine is clear. As in Palestine, the war in Iraq is against civilians, mostly children. According to UNICEF, Iraq once had one of the highest indicators for the well-being of children. Today, a quarter of children between the ages of six months and five years suffer acute or chronic malnutrition, worse than during the years of sanctions. Poverty and disease have risen with each day of the occupation. In April, in British-occupied Basra, the European aid agency Saving Children from War reported: "The mortality of young children had increased by 30 percent compared with the Saddam Hussein era." They die because the hospitals have no ventilators and the water supply, which the British were meant to have fixed, is more polluted than ever. Children fall victim to unexploded U.S. and British cluster bombs. They play in areas contaminated by depleted uranium; by contrast, British army survey teams venture there only in full-body radiation suits, face masks, and gloves. Unlike the children they came to "liberate," British troops are given what the Ministry of Defense calls "full biological testing." Was Arthur Miller right? Do we "internally deny" all this, or do we listen to distant voices? On my last trip to Palestine, I was rewarded, on leaving Gaza, with a spectacle of Palestinian flags fluttering from inside the walled compounds. Children are responsible for this. No one tells them to do it. They make flagpoles out of sticks tied together, and one or two climb on to a wall and hold the flag between them, silently. They do it, believing they will tell the world.

FreedomExpressions©

What's love?

Do not overrate what you have received, nor envy others.
He who envies others does not obtain peace of mind. Words have the power to both destroy and heal. When words are both true and kind, they can change our world. An insincere and evil friend is more to be feared than a wild beast,A wild beast may wound your body, but an evil friend will wound your mind . We are what we think, All that we are arises with our thoughts. With our thoughts, we make our world.To be idle is a short road to death and to be diligent is a way of life; foolish people are idle, wise people are diligent.

When we come into contact with the other person, our thoughts and actions should express our mind of compassion, even if that person says and does things that are not easy to accept. We practice in this way until we see clearly that our love is not contingent upon the other person being lovable.We really have to understand the person we want to love. If our love is only a will to possess, it is not love. If we only think of ourselves, if we know only our own needs and ignore the needs of the other person, we cannot love.

People deal too much with the negative, with what is wrong. Why not try and see positive things, to just touch those things and make them bloom? In true dialogue, both sides are willing to change. Training is needed in order to love properly; and to be able to give happiness and joy, you must practice DEEP LOOKING directed toward the other person you love. Because if you do not understand this person, you cannot love properly. Understanding is the essence of love. If you cannot understand, you cannot love. That is the message of the Buddha. [True Love. A Practice for Awakening the Heart.] So if we love someone, we should train in being able to listen. By listening with calm and understanding, we can ease the suffering of another person.

Love is the capacity to take care, to protect, to nourish. If you are not capable of generating that kind of energy toward yourself- if you are not capable of taking care of yourself, of nourishing yourself, of protecting yourself- it is very difficult to take care of another person.

The essence of love and compassion is understanding, the ability to recognize the physical, material, and psychological suffering of others, to put ourselves "inside the skin" of the other. We "go inside" their body, feelings, and mental formations, and witness for ourselves their suffering. Shallow observation as an outsider is not enough to see their suffering. We must become one with the subject of our observation. When we are in contact with another's suffering, a feeling of compassion is born in us. Compassion means, literally, "to suffer with."

By,

The Author

FreedomExpressions©

Cold...

Despairs rephrase reluctantly i shoved,
those unkind the unsure the untold,
Conversion to disputes where liaison lays,
Cold and buried
six feet underneath it all.

Enchanting flows of lies and deceits
Converge reality to time,
where would i stand before you,
How would i wake inside you...
for i m already buried
six feet under your cold biasness

By,

The Author

FreedomExpressions©

This is Politics

My hands grip your throat I need your end
Burned, Staked, ripped apart - I avenge
For every life you have taken
I am here to repay
You will scream "oh god why?"
'cause i'm god that's fucking why

By,

The Author

FreedomExpressions©

Dissapointments with the World and Yourselves

Never retreat to the depths for desire
Never forward to the temps for lustier
Cause never for we would see
the light torched inwards
gazed with cruel the unintended.

At the sight of your demise
I know what I must do
Choke
Die choking on your every word
Swallow every blasphemy
Eat out your heart and make it bleed
Tie the noose around my neck
Make this life end

By,

The Author

FreedomExpressions©

We Die in Absolutions.

Concerns manipulated
transcendence manifested
fracture my memory
in depths of your fall
say your sacred prayers now

You wronged me
for instances from edge knife
fracture my memory
in depths of your fall
say your sacred prayers now
say your jovial prayers now

Cause tomorrow
would be Absolution

By,

The Author

FreedomExpressions©

Disturbing Thoughts of People

Fantasizing my gruesome ending
This world looks down upon
My flesh is ripped at daily
It's the cross I bear
I feel it tear out my insides
A pain so heavy I could collapse
I feel it just may kill me
I must brave through this storm
A man who can stand on his own two feet
Without eating from their claws
Life feels like Hell should
But this Hells so cold
lacerations,Sob so heavily, we choke, then we die...

By,

The Author

FreedomExpressions©

Humanity today.

We have lost our spiritual equilibrium and reversed our values.
We have exploited the poor and called it the lottery.
We have rewarded laziness and called it welfare.
We have killed our unborn and called it choice.
We have shot anti-abortionists and called it justifiable.
We have neglected to discipline our children and called it building self esteem.
We have abused power and called it politics.
We have coveted our neighbor's possessions and called it ambition.
We have polluted the air with profanity and pornography and called it freedom of expression.
We have ridiculed the time-honored values of our forefathers and called it enlightenment.

By,

The Author

FreedomExpressions©

An Email from A Prolific Writer Jessica Ong ..

A little About Jessica Ong

Jessica Ong

Email: jessicaongster@gmail.com

I have been writing for 8 years and working as a full time writer/editor for the past 3 years. I hold a Bachelor of Arts (Philosophy) and a Diploma in Culinary Arts. My areas of concentration in terms of writing would be script, food and travel. Previous works have been published in Malaysian magazines, newspapers and websites. Should you require a portfolio, please do not hesitate to email me.

from jessica ong to freedom3xpressions@gmail.comdate Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 10:05 PMsubject Is Freedom of Expression Lost on Asian Culture?mailed-by gmail.comsigned-by gmail.comhide details Nov 24 (1 day ago)
Expressing oneself in an atypical Asian culture is actually considered 'answering back', which on a hierarchical stance, is an utter shaming of the elders. When a younger person choose to simply voice out an opinion, it is treated as being defensive and rude. Thoughts should be kept to oneself and self is not something you create or find anymore. Self becomes repressed and personal is non-existent. How do we change that?

from Freedom Expressions

to jessica ong

date Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 3:10 PM

subject Re: Is Freedom of Expression Lost on Asian Culture?

mailed-by gmail.com

hide details 3:10 PM (13 minutes ago)

You have a point there, In terms of Asian Culture VS The Rest Of the World and towards Humanity."Expressing oneself in an atypical Asian culture is actually considered 'answering back', which on a hierarchical stance, is an utter shaming of the elders." Nevertheless Yes i will have to agree that this is yet one great trade! in retrospective of preserving the traditions and the way of Asian's life. Again, me myself is a pure Chinese, brought and bred in Malaysia, with the things i had done in my past 25 years of life, i had been categorized as unfilial, irrespective, and self centered.

But Again Jessica, Asians Are the Greatest People in Humankind History (The Chinese, The Indians, The Arabs)and if you think that "Only Asian Culture" is facing such problem .. Please reconsider your thoughts..Look at the western for instance...Does it make any differences in anyway that they are free to express expressions? i doubt so it is still projected the same way like the Asian does. British , Scottish , Americans has their own taboo in expressions.

So again My question to you Jess.. Do we have rights to express regardless to where we are from ? or what we are ?

This is why i started off this freedomexpressions cause to cultivate intellects to see the indifferent differences towards morality,believes,politics,and people. US as Humans.

Change always starts from one selfs.. people always look for inspirations all over the world or place or people.yet it doesn't change anything to the mentality of expressions...Cultures remain Cultures,Traditions remain Traditions.But the mind is one and unique and different.That makes people unique.People tend to seek freedom in all ways I reckon .. a simple expression through writing would change the world and in your context of Asian culture.

If u dare to write your feelings,They will dare to read your feelings. Through writing we harm no one,we hurt no one,because it is an Expression.

FreedomExpressions©

FreedomExpressions© - Humanity I Love You by ee Cummings

Humanity i love you
because you would rather black the boots of
success than enquire whose soul dangles from his
watch-chain which would be embarrassing for both

parties and because you
unflinchingly applaud all
songs containing the words country home and
mother when sung at the old howard

Humanity i love you because
when you're hard up you pawn your
intelligence to buy a drink and when
you're flush pride keeps

you from the pawn shops and
because you are continually committing
nuisances but more
especially in your own house

Humanity i love you because you
are perpetually putting the secret of
life in your pants and forgetting
it's there and sitting down

on it
and because you are
forever making poems in the lap
of death Humanity

i hate you

By,
ee Cummings



zukafu zukafu (10/22/2009 8:30:00 AM)
Loved this poem, he was so right. humanity celebrates the morons and the hard working man is punished. Excellent poem!

Peter Pan (3/17/2007 7:17:00 AM)
He's the only man that uses love and hate correctly.
Bringing out what he hates about humanity, I can almost hear him saying, 'Wait a minute, Humanity, you suck.'
Brilliant <3

Emily Zee (1/1/2007 11:35:00 PM)
absolutely amazing... of course :)
Faith Elizabeth Brigham (10/8/2005 5:27:00 PM)

"A poem with depth and strong emotional impact...a true masterpiece"FreedomExpressions©

FreedomExpressions© - Humanity by Earam Dio

Humanity

has the humanity gone
Or every one became looking for his own
And does not looking for what is going on
Tell me tell where it is now and I will run
Cause I know in it is land will be the fun
And I will feel and see the real sun
Now tell me please where it is my son
To help it before to be something and done
We lived with the humanity with everyone
We were use our hearts and now they use the gun
Running after the needs and forgot the human
We knew the evil and how to shun
And now they use the evil with anyone
The humanity is in a place, waiting alone
But none thinks to go there.. None
So let us find this place together my son

Earam Dio


FreedomExpressions©

FreedomExpressions© - Shares A Deep Angst Poem by Jason Peplinski

Brew City
Gotta get out of this city
Need to leave this town
Cant take it any longer
Need to leave right now
Im going fuckin crazy
losin my mind
peace is so hard to find around here

so how do you do it?
day after day ears filled with bullshit
just push it away
remove that baracade
you know its gonna be unsafe
youre mentally unstable
but youre trying
youre trying.....
right now...wont let you down
theres no way we could make it through this

We're wasting away
day by day
we're doing nothing but wasting away
I wanna get faded
shit faced
ravaging the town
eight ball in my pocket
two hookers in the back seat
jockin bitches
i guess should have saw something
that no ones ever done

lets set fire to this town
lets burn this mother fucker down to the ground
wont make a sound
they all say that we'll make it through this

get out of this city
need to leave this town
cant take it any longer
need to leave right now
im going fucking crazy
really goin mad
now that i think about it
this poem is not that bad...



but it still sucks
© Jason Peplinski, All rights reserved

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's speech to the UN General Assembly

Mr. President, Ladies and Gentlemen,

Nearly 62 years ago, the United Nations recognized the right of the Jews, an ancient people 3,500 years-old, to a state of their own in their ancestral homeland.

I stand here today as the Prime Minister of Israel, the Jewish state, and I speak to you on behalf of my country and my people. The United Nations was founded after the carnage of World War II and the horrors of the Holocaust. It was charged with preventing the recurrence of such horrendous events.

Nothing has undermined that central mission more than the systematic assault on the truth. Yesterday the President of Iran stood at this very podium, spewing his latest anti-Semitic rants. Just a few days earlier, he again claimed that the Holocaust is a lie.

Last month, I went to a villa in a suburb of Berlin called Wannsee. There, on January 20, 1942, after a hearty meal, senior Nazi officials met and decided how to exterminate the Jewish people. The detailed minutes of that meeting have been preserved by successive German governments. Here is a copy of those minutes, in which the Nazis issued precise instructions on how to carry out the extermination of the Jews.

Is this a lie?

A day before I was in Wannsee, I was given in Berlin the original construction plans for the Auschwitz-Birkenau concentration camp. Those plans are signed by Hitler?s deputy, Heinrich Himmler himself. Here is a copy of the plans for Auschwitz-Birkenau, where one million Jews were murdered. Is this too a lie?

This June, President Obama visited the Buchenwald concentration camp. Did President Obama pay tribute to a lie?

And what of the Auschwitz survivors whose arms still bear the tattooed numbers branded on them by the Nazis? Are those tattoos a lie? One-third of all Jews perished in the conflagration. Nearly every Jewish family was affected, including my own. My wife's grandparents, her father?s two sisters and three brothers, and all the aunts, uncles and cousins were all murdered by the Nazis. Is that also a lie?

Yesterday, the man who calls the Holocaust a lie spoke from this podium. To those who refused to come here and to those who left this room in protest, I commend you. You stood up for moral clarity and you brought honor to your countries.

But to those who gave this Holocaust-denier a hearing, I say on behalf of my people, the Jewish people, and decent people everywhere: Have you no shame? Have you no decency?

A mere six decades after the Holocaust, you give legitimacy to a man who denies that the murder of six million Jews took place and pledges to wipe out the Jewish state.

What a disgrace! What a mockery of the charter of the United Nations!

Perhaps some of you think that this man and his odious regime threaten only the Jews. You're wrong.

History has shown us time and again that what starts with attacks on the Jews eventually ends up engulfing many others.

This Iranian regime is fueled by an extreme fundamentalism that burst onto the world scene three decades ago after lying dormant for centuries.

In the past thirty years, this fanaticism has swept the globe with a murderous violence and cold-blooded impartiality in its choice of victims. It has callously slaughtered Moslems and Christians, Jews and Hindus, and many others. Though it is comprised of different offshoots, the adherents of this unforgiving creed seek to return humanity to medieval times.

Wherever they can, they impose a backward regimented society where women, minorities, gays or anyone not deemed to be a true believer is brutally subjugated. The struggle against this fanaticism does not pit faith against faith nor civilization against civilization.

It pits civilization against barbarism, the 21st century against the 9th century, those who sanctify life against those who glorify death.

The primitivism of the 9th century ought to be no match for the progress of the 21st century. The allure of freedom, the power of technology, the reach of communications should surely win the day. Ultimately, the past cannot triumph over the future. And the future offers all nations magnificent bounties of hope. The pace of progress is growing exponentially.

It took us centuries to get from the printing press to the telephone, decades to get from the telephone to the personal computer, and only a few years to get from the personal computer to the internet.

What seemed impossible a few years ago is already outdated, and we can scarcely fathom the changes that are yet to come. We will crack the genetic code. We will cure the incurable. We will lengthen our lives. We will find a cheap alternative to fossil fuels and clean up the planet.

I am proud that my country Israel is at the forefront of these advances ? by leading innovations in science and technology, medicine and biology, agriculture and water, energy and the environment. These innovations the world over offer humanity a sunlit future of unimagined promise.

But if the most primitive fanaticism can acquire the most deadly weapons, the march of history could be reversed for a time. And like the belated victory over the Nazis, the forces of progress and freedom will prevail only after an horrific toll of blood and fortune has been exacted from mankind. That is why the greatest threat facing the world today is the marriage between religious fanaticism and the weapons of mass destruction.

The most urgent challenge facing this body is to prevent the tyrants of Tehran from acquiring nuclear weapons. Are the member states of the United Nations up to that challenge? Will the international community confront a despotism that terrorizes its own people as they bravely stand up for freedom?

Will it take action against the dictators who stole an election in broad daylight and gunned down Iranian protesters who died in the streets choking in their own blood? Will the international community thwart the world's most pernicious sponsors and practitioners of terrorism?

Above all, will the international community stop the terrorist regime of Iran from developing atomic weapons, thereby endangering the peace of the entire world?

The people of Iran are courageously standing up to this regime. People of goodwill around the world stand with them, as do the thousands who have been protesting outside this hall. Will the United Nations stand by their side?

Ladies and Gentlemen,

The jury is still out on the United Nations, and recent signs are not encouraging. Rather than condemning the terrorists and their Iranian patrons, some here have condemned their victims. That is exactly what a recent UN report on Gaza did, falsely equating the terrorists with those they targeted.

For eight long years, Hamas fired from Gaza thousands of missiles, mortars and rockets on nearby Israeli cities. Year after year, as these missiles were deliberately hurled at our civilians, not a single UN resolution was passed condemning those criminal attacks. We heard nothing ? absolutely nothing ? from the UN Human Rights Council, a misnamed institution if there ever was one.

In 2005, hoping to advance peace, Israel unilaterally withdrew from every inch of Gaza. It dismantled 21 settlements and uprooted over 8,000 Israelis. We didn't get peace. Instead we got an Iranian backed terror base fifty miles from Tel Aviv. Life in Israeli towns and cities next to Gaza became a nightmare. You see, the Hamas rocket attacks not only continued, they increased tenfold. Again, the UN was silent.

Finally, after eight years of this unremitting assault, Israel was finally forced to respond. But how should we have responded? Well, there is only one example in history of thousands of rockets being fired on a country's civilian population. It happened when the Nazis rocketed British cities during World War II. During that war, the allies leveled German cities, causing hundreds of thousands of casualties. Israel chose to respond differently. Faced with an enemy committing a double war crime of firing on civilians while hiding behind civilians ? Israel sought to conduct surgical strikes against the rocket launchers.

That was no easy task because the terrorists were firing missiles from homes and schools, using mosques as weapons depots and ferreting explosives in ambulances. Israel, by contrast, tried to minimize casualties by urging Palestinian civilians to vacate the targeted areas.

We dropped countless flyers over their homes, sent thousands of text messages and called thousands of cell phones asking people to leave. Never has a country gone to such extraordinary lengths to remove the enemy's civilian population from harm's way.

Yet faced with such a clear case of aggressor and victim, who did the UN Human Rights Council decide to condemn? Israel. A democracy legitimately defending itself against terror is morally hanged, drawn and quartered, and given an unfair trial to boot.

By these twisted standards, the UN Human Rights Council would have dragged Roosevelt and Churchill to the dock as war criminals. What a perversion of truth. What a perversion of justice.

Delegates of the United Nations,

Will you accept this farce?

Because if you do, the United Nations would revert to its darkest days, when the worst violators of human rights sat in judgment against the law-abiding democracies, when Zionism was equated with racism and when an automatic majority could declare that the earth is flat.

If this body does not reject this report, it would send a message to terrorists everywhere: Terror pays; if you launch your attacks from densely populated areas, you will win immunity. And in condemning Israel, this body would also deal a mortal blow to peace. Here's why.

When Israel left Gaza, many hoped that the missile attacks would stop. Others believed that at the very least, Israel would have international legitimacy to exercise its right of self-defense. What legitimacy? What self-defense?

The same UN that cheered Israel as it left Gaza and promised to back our right of self-defense now accuses us ?my people, my country - of war crimes? And for what? For acting responsibly in self-defense. What a travesty!

Israel justly defended itself against terror. This biased and unjust report is a clear-cut test for all governments. Will you stand with Israel or will you stand with the terrorists?

We must know the answer to that question now. Now and not later. Because if Israel is again asked to take more risks for peace, we must know today that you will stand with us tomorrow. Only if we have the confidence that we can defend ourselves can we take further risks for peace.

Ladies and Gentlemen,

All of Israel wants peace.

Any time an Arab leader genuinely wanted peace with us, we made peace. We made peace with Egypt led by Anwar Sadat. We made peace with Jordan led by King Hussein. And if the Palestinians truly want peace, I and my government, and the people of Israel, will make peace. But we want a genuine peace, a defensible peace, a permanent peace. In 1947, this body voted to establish two states for two peoples ? a Jewish state and an Arab state. The Jews accepted that resolution. The Arabs rejected it.
We ask the Palestinians to finally do what they have refused to do for 62 years: Say yes to a Jewish state. Just as we are asked to recognize a nation-state for the Palestinian people, the Palestinians must be asked to recognize the nation state of the Jewish people. The Jewish people are not foreign conquerors in the Land of Israel. This is the land of our forefathers.

Inscribed on the walls outside this building is the great Biblical vision of peace: "Nation shall not lift up sword against nation. They shall learn war no more." These words were spoken by the Jewish prophet Isaiah 2,800 years ago as he walked in my country, in my city, in the hills of Judea and in the streets of Jerusalem.

We are not strangers to this land. It is our homeland. As deeply connected as we are to this land, we recognize that the Palestinians also live there and want a home of their own. We want to live side by side with them, two free peoples living in peace, prosperity and dignity.
But we must have security. The Palestinians should have all the powers to govern themselves except those handful of powers that could endanger Israel.

That is why a Palestinian state must be effectively demilitarized. We don't want another Gaza, another Iranian backed terror base abutting Jerusalem and perched on the hills a few kilometers from Tel Aviv.

We want peace.

I believe such a peace can be achieved. But only if we roll back the forces of terror, led by Iran, that seek to destroy peace, eliminate Israel and overthrow the world order. The question facing the international community is whether it is prepared to confront those forces or accommodate them.

Over seventy years ago, Winston Churchill lamented what he called the "confirmed unteachability of mankind," the unfortunate habit of civilized societies to sleep until danger nearly overtakes them.

Churchill bemoaned what he called the "want of foresight, the unwillingness to act when action will be simple and effective, the lack of clear thinking, the confusion of counsel until emergency comes, until self-preservation strikes its jarring gong."

I speak here today in the hope that Churchill's assessment of the "unteachibility of mankind" is for once proven wrong.
I speak here today in the hope that we can learn from history -- that we can prevent danger in time.

In the spirit of the timeless words spoken to Joshua over 3,000 years ago, let us be strong and of good courage. Let us confront this peril, secure our future and, God willing, forge an enduring peace for generations to come

FreedomExpressions©

Humanist Ethics

"Humanists endorse universal morality based on the commonality of human nature and the belief that knowledge of right and wrong is based on our understanding of individual and joint interests, rather than a system of ethics stemming from a transcendental or arbitrarily local source, rejecting faith completely as a basis for moral action. The humanist ethics goal is a search for viable individual, social and political principles of conduct, judging them on their ability to enhance human well-being and individual responsibility.The International Humanist and Ethical Union (IHEU) is the worldwide umbrella organization for those adhering to the Humanist life stance. Member organisations and individual members are required to accept the following statement:

Humanism is a democratic and ethical life stance, which affirms that human beings have the right and responsibility to give meaning and shape to their own lives. It stands for the building of a more humane society through an ethic based on human and other natural values in the spirit of reason and free inquiry through human capabilities. It is not theistic, and it does not accept supernatural views of reality.Humanism is also known to adopt principles of the Golden Rule. As Oscar Wilde once said, "Selfishness is not living as one wishes to live, it is asking others to live as one wishes to live. This emphasizes a respect for other people's identities and ideals." From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

FreedomExpressions©

Psychological Extinction.

PSYCHOLOGY reduction in response: the decreasing or dying out of a behavioral response created by conditioning because of a lack of reinforcement.

Man has emerge top of the food chain with ultimate prowess definite. According to Darwin's Theory. He says "Man was evolution of the Apes"The reason why being Man still categorize themselves at the top of the Food Chain because they have something any other

species has, bestowed with The Brain. Below are some citations on the wonders of the Human Brains.

"The brain is the center of the nervous system in all vertebrate, and most invertebrate, animals. ^{Shepherd, Neurobiology"}

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"There has long been debate about whether the qualities of mind, personality, and intelligence can mainly be attributed to heredity or to upbringing; the nature versus nurture debate.This is not just a philosophical question: it has great practical relevance to parents and educators. Although many details remain to be settled, neuroscience clearly shows that both factors are essential. Genes determine the general form of the brain, and genes determine how the brain reacts to experience. Experience, however, is required to refine the matrix of synaptic connections. In some respects it is mainly a matter of presence or absence of experience during critical periods of development.In other respects, the quantity and quality of experience may be more relevant: for example, there is substantial evidence that animals raised in enriched environments have thicker cortices, indicating a higher density of synaptic connections, than animals whose levels of stimulation are restricted."

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"Most programs for digital computers rely on long sequences of operations executed in a specific order, and therefore could not be "ported" into a brain without becoming extremely slow.Computer scientists, however, have found that some types of problems lend themselves naturally to algorithms that can efficiently be executed by brainlike networks of processing elements.One important problem that falls into this group is object recognition: on a digital computer, the seemingly simple task of recognizing a face in a photo turns out to be tremendously difficult, and even the best current programs don't do it well; the human brain, however, reliably solves this problem in a fraction of a second. The process feels almost effortless, but this is only because our brains are heavily optimized for it. Other tasks that are computationally a great deal simpler,such as adding pairs of hundred-digit numbers, feelmore difficult because the human brain is not adapted to execute them efficiently.

The computational functions of the brain arestudied both by neuroscientists and computer scientists.There have been several attempts to build electronic computers that operate on brainlike principles, including a supercomputer called the Connection Machine, but to date none of them has achieved notable success. Brains have several advantages that are difficult to duplicate in an electronic device, including (1) the microscopic size of the processing elements, (2) the three-dimensional arrangement of connections, and (3) the fact that each neuron generates its own power(metabolically)." From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Pardon me, But My Thoughts lays hear:

If Humans are so well equip with the most efficient "Synaps.Transferring.Hub.of neuro.networks" Can't Process the Meaning of Peace and Harmony?

"Peace (symbol: ☮) is commonly understood as the absence of hostility, or the existence of healthy or newly-healed interpersonal or international relationships, safety in matters of social or economic welfare, the acknowledgment of equality and fairness in political relationships and, in world matters, peacetime; a state of being absent of any war or conflict." From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Is it due to Psychological Extinction in mankind as HUMANS?

or it's just plain fact that no matter how much this world had changed, no matter how well life had improved, HUMANITY is fading. The world's lack of inspirational writers now compared to the Great Civilizations of the past,The British Renaissance Period after the Dark Ages,  At least the World War had Propagandas and No Propaganda for Humanity Awareness?
This is the main cause of Humanity problems, We can all blame this world that we are in but we are never gonna change where we are in If we are not HUMANS together. FACT

International organization whose stated aims are facilitating cooperation in international law, international security, economic development, social progress, human rights, and the achieving of world peace. The UN was founded in 1945 after World War II to replace the League of Nations, to stop wars betweencountries, and to provide a platform for dialogue. It contains multiple subsidiary organizations to carry out its missions.

Again they had been trying to instill humanity.

    












So "Get Up Stand Up Stand Up For Your Rights,Don't Give up the Fight" Bob Marley,

To the world in every great continents!

For Humanity!

"Believe in your Country,Not the Politics" FreedomExpressions

"ONE LOVE"Bob Marley

Arranged &Express By,

The Author

FreedomExpressions©